A Quick Intro Post: Also, my views on potential veeps

Bill O' Reilly claims that the media has a "liberal agenda"; and he might just be right. After all, it is the media's job to report the facts, and, as Stephen Colbert put it, the facts have a well known liberal bias. This is a report on politics, from a young and progressive viewpoint. This is My Liberal Agenda.

As you all most likely know, throughout this week there has been buzz surrounding a potential announcement by John McCain regarding who will be his running mate, and the McCain campaign hasn't done much to defuse the rumors (although perhaps only to deflect attention from Obama and his tour). As of this posting, nothing has been officially announced regarding this, however, this has not stopped speculation and commentary about the running mate choices of both McCain and Obama. In this post, I'll comment on some of the pros and cons of a few commonly discussed potential running mates for Obama.

Option 1: Hillary Rodham Clinton
"Dream ticket" anyone? Senator Clinton is perhaps the most talked about potential running mate for Obama, and for good reason. After all, having Clinton as his running mate would be a definite plus for party unity, and would hopefully regain the alienated "Democrats for McCain" voters. Also, Hillary's experience would help counteract Barack's reputation as a newcomer, and her popularity amongst blue-collar, older, and Hispanic voters could help strengthen his weaker spots.

However, there are a few issues with having her as a running mate. First, having a Clinton on your ticket might not be the best way to win over independent voters, or voters who consider themselves to swing to the right, and could possibly contradict Obama's projected image as a new kind of politician, one who is above partisanship. Also, there are the issues of whether Clinton would be able to "lay low" and be content with sharing the spotlight with her former opponent, and whether or not the hatchet has been buried far enough for something like this to work.

Option 2: Jim Webb
This Virginia senator and former Secretary of the Navy under the Reagan administation could be just the man to bring Obama a little closer to the center, and therefore increase his popularity with moderate-to-conservative voters and Southerners. Plus, Webb would be a great boost to Obama's credibility regarding foreign policy, as well as leveling the playing field in regard to families of members of the military.

On the other hand, Jim Webb isn't one to lay low either, and he would have to be very careful lest he stir up controversy. Also, Webb has less Senate experience than Obama, something that wouldn't be convincing to those unsure about Barack's readiness for the job. Lastly, some further-left voters (including me, actually), may feel sold out, as if Obama was somewhat abandoning the progressive principles that helped get him nominated.

Option 3: Ted Strickland
The main benefits of having Strickland as a running mate would be that he would take away voters from McCain. The governor would rally up favorite son votes in Ohio, a very important swing state that is essential for the McCain campaign. Like Webb, Strickland would also gain support from more conservative voters, as well as support from blue-collar workers due to his humble, average-Joe image.

However, Strickland has some of the same issues as Webb. He could alienate further-left voters towards abstaining from voting or voting third party, as well as making Obama seem too motivated by political strategy, which would conflict with his new kind of politician image (although it could alternatively prove that he is in fact not "naive" or "unrealistic" in his hopes for change). Also, Ted Strickland could not be that beneficial towards Obama's foreign policy credentials, as that isn't his strongest point either.

Who would I suggest as a running mate? I'm afraid to say that I don't really know; they all have their various pros and cons, I suppose that's why I'm not the one making the decision here. These are just a few potential running mates, there are many, many others, including but not limited to Chuck Hagel, Wesley Clark, and Dennis Kucinich (actually no, not Kucinich, that's just wishful thinking on my part). I could (and probably should) go into detail about them all, but frankly I'm running out of space (and patience). So I guess that's all for now. See you next post!